ߣߣÊÓƵn vice-chancellors have pointed the finger at inadequate public funding to explain the decline of almost all of the country's top universities in the ߣߣÊÓƵ-QS World Rankings published last week.

ߣߣÊÓƵn universities in the top 200
University	2008 rank	2007 rank
ߣߣÊÓƵn National	16	(16)
Sydney	37	(31)
Melbourne	38	()
Queensland	43	(33)
New South Wales	45	(44)
Monash	47	(43)
Western ߣߣÊÓƵ	83	(64)
Adelaide	106	(62)
Macquarie	182	(168)

While ߣߣÊÓƵ's higher education sector remains one of the strongest after the US and UK, with the ߣߣÊÓƵn National University (ANU) retaining the highest ranking of any institution outside the two leading nations, eight of its nine universities to make the top 200 saw their positions fall, year on year.

As the ߣߣÊÓƵn sector analyses the reasons for this slip, blame has been laid firmly at the door of the Government's funding regime.

John Taplin, pro vice-chancellor (international) at the University of Adelaide, which fell from 62nd to 106th, said that, despite the declining fortunes of ߣߣÊÓƵn universities, their performance in the rankings was impressive when the constraints they faced were considered.

ߣߣÊÓƵ

He said: "Collectively, 24 per cent of the public universities within the ߣߣÊÓƵn higher education sector are included in the 2008 top 200 list. This is an impressive result, and especially so as we have seen a significant decline in per capita funding of universities ... during the past decade, and because (universities') research activities have not been fully funded by the Government, either."

Earlier this year the Government commissioned two reviews of ߣߣÊÓƵn higher education and research, which the sector hopes will address these issues.

ߣߣÊÓƵ

Professor Taplin said: "It is clear that there is a relationship between a university's world ranking and how well funded it is. For ߣߣÊÓƵn universities to continue to be major contributors to the advancement of knowledge globally, it is vital that the funding issues are addressed effectively in the near future."

Ian Chubb, vice-chancellor of ANU, which claimed 16th place, said his institution was "in a pretty good neighbourhood" at the top of the table, but he argued that ߣߣÊÓƵ should take note of other countries, where rival sectors had benefited from a "massive, selective injections of funds".

He said: "We have to recognise that not all ߣߣÊÓƵn universities are ever going to be funded enough to have us all in the global top 50, so there has to be selective funding, linked in some way to performance."

International funding differentials were also raised by Glyn Davis, vice-chancellor of the University of Melbourne, which fell from th to 38th. He said: "It is very difficult for ߣߣÊÓƵn universities to compete in these rankings with well-resourced UK, US and Japanese universities ... This is why it is vital that the current review of higher education in ߣߣÊÓƵ seriously addresses this issue."

ߣߣÊÓƵ

john.gill@tsleducation.com.